Above, the late Helen Smart.
After the morning service at our parish church the congregation gather for tea, coffee and cakes. Those who know me will probably aver that the cake is the reason for my attendance! In my defence I submit that the cakes are not my sole reason for attending. Another is the fellowship and a chance to talk with people I now count as friends, neighbours and acquaintances. One of these was a lady in her nineties. She used to attend regularly but age and infirmity have caught up with her. All were pleased to see her and that she was still in the land of the living, or as my late father used to say of himself, “Still breathing!”
Nobody however is immortal and at some point in the future this lady will no longer be with us. When that event occurs whilst causing her loved ones to grieve and the rest of us mourn her passing, it will in no way be described as a tragedy. This because when, like my late father who died aged 97, it is the passing of a life long lived. Even though in my father’s case the two closest people to my, my mother and myself were greatly affected.
Tragedies in this context occur when a person is struck down in the prime of life. When this happens it is generally by an accident (RTAs being a common form of death) or a serious illness. The former is always sudden and unexpected. The latter is something that the person and their loved ones can prepare for.
However, there are – mercifully rare – cases where an apparently perfectly healthy adult dies suddenly. In the UK and the USA such cases require (legally) a postmortem/autopsy. I would not be reporting upon this lady’s tragic demise (https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/its-nightmare-waiting-wake-up-27576838) were it not for two recent deaths of two similarly aged people in our parish. The two people were men of similar age to this lady and again they died in their sleep and the PMs could show no reason for the death. Neither were suffering from a chronic illness nor had they underlying morbidities.
When such a case happens, the PM can often find that the deceased died from sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (SADS). This is when someone dies suddenly following a cardiac arrest and no obvious cause can be found. GOTO: https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/conditions/sads#What%20Causes%20Sads
However when I heard about the deaths of the two parishioners the person who told me reported that the doctors could find no cause and that they found no evidence of a cardiac arrest let alone a cause of same. It is as my late father said, “they stopped breathing”. The difference being that Dad was joking and this is no joke. It serious. Very serious.
That it is very serious is demonstrated by the way the authorities and the mainstream media (the BBC) is under-reporting this and that such as Mr Jeff Taylor (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCE3181Md63Eg7uTybf6HgNw) and Dr. John Campbell (https://www.youtube.com/user/Campbellteaching) have both experienced little local difficulties with what in the 21st Century is called “social media”.
Those of us in the Brexiteer community (what used to be called the EuroRealist community) know well that when the establishment suppresses news or information or “goings on” things are serious!
Something is up!!!!!
The question is: What????
My stance is well known. It is my firm opinion that these events have to be considered in context. That is to say, a number of other things that appear to be “going on” and that means our rulers not reacting to type!
Mainstream politicians are an ambitious self serving bunch. They want the voters to vote for them! This means that they will try avoid enacting policies that are unpopular. Which is exactly why so many democratic countries have large sovereign debts!
Thus, when these mainstream politicians are adopting policies that promise to alienate large numbers of voters one has to ask: Why????
Now, BG readers know what I think about “Net Zero” and anthropogenic global warming – something the BG refers to as “glow bull warning” – and that I am linking this with what used to be called UFOs and are now referred to as UAPs. BG readers also know that I have linked COVID-19 and the vaccines to what many readers refer to as “little green men” – who are very unlikely going to be, little, green or men! My reason for the linkage can be found in HG Wells’s classic “War of the Worlds” in which the invading Martians died of Earth’s bacteria for which they had no immunity.
Of course, any highly advanced ET civilisation capable of developing and constructing spaceships with “warp drive” (sorry but using “Star Trek” terminology is best suited to this) will be fully aware of this danger – both to them and us – and take measures to prevent it!
It is my contention that COVID-19 and the vaccines were introduced to an unsuspecting humanity because numerous governments have been in remote conversation with these ETs and both parties (human governments and the ETs) are preparing for an eventual “First Contact” scenario.
This would provide a logical explanation to a very disturbing situation that appears to be developing in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines. This is where a number of individuals appear to have been injured and in fact killed subsequent to receiving one or more vaccinations.
A “conventional” explanation for this disaster would be this: COVID-19 appeared to be a highly contagious and infectious disease that appeared to be serious in old and frail people, less serious in the middle aged and minor in young adults and even less so in children. Realising this and (in the UK) cognisant that many members of the ethnic minority communities (especially South Asian) were multi-generational households were very concerned to ensure that transmission was reduced as far as possible to minimise deaths and importantly to ensure that the NHS would not collapse. The politicians knew that were the NHS to collapse and chaos ensue their political careers would be over.
This is logical scenario. However, now that the vaccine disaster is becoming apparent why would they be doubling down of the vaccines especially when the latest variants of COVID-19 are less serious than at the beginning of the pandemic! A logical course would be to give a known vaccine that may be ineffective but was safe!
There must be another explanation! There are those who suggest that the aim is to reduce the human population in order to mitigate “climate change”. I cannot accept this. Certain well known individuals have been mentioned in this regard. I cannot accept the suggestion that these individuals are deliberately bringing about what in effect could be described as genocide.
Were these individuals so minded, their actions (in targeting nations such as Italy and the UK that have very low birthrates) would be incompetent for were they so minded the nations to attack this way are nations with rapidly growing populations not declining ones!
I therefore am firmly of the opinion that the COVID-19 virus, it’s descendants and the vaccine programmes are part of a policy to protect the humans of Earth and the ETs from another planet and that the “excess deaths” are regarded as “collateral casualties”.
Notwithstanding this however, preparing for a “First Contact” requires A LOT MORE preparation work besides sorting out the immunological science! That is the easy bit! The hard bit is sorting out the “social science”!
Sorting out the social science might involve tackling the issue from a “left field” perspective!
I think that the way mainstream politicians are seemingly caving into much of what the transgender rights movement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_rights_movement) have on their agenda is of note.
Why?
Because many of the individuals in this movement appear to be disturbed and troubled individuals with an agenda that could not be further away from the majority of the politicians constituents concerns and the endorsement and support of this agenda that results in journalists asking questions of Privy Councillors such as Sir Kier Starmer KCB such as “Can a woman have a penis?” and Sir Keir not giving the biologically obvious answer! Sir Keir must know the correct answer to this question as he is married with children! This after all is a man who desperately wants to be the UK’s next Prime Minister!
So I ask this question: Why are the authorities striving so hard to facilitate the agenda of a tiny number (in relation to the UK’s population) of disturbed and troubled individuals?
I believe it might be to cause a level of social and cultural disorientation. This because I believe that humanity will at some point in the future have to face one of the ultimate paradigm shifts: Acceptance of the existence of ETs that are utterly different from themselves, not only in physiology (appearance) but social organisation at the most basic level – which includes “gender issues”.
It is apparent that the First World democracies such as the USA and what used to be the British Empire (the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand) are rapidly developing into authoritarian regimes. For instance GB News reported that were one to distribute leaflets (in the Thames Valley area) stating that a woman was an adult female human being the police would arrest and question those distributing such! GB News further reports that Labour are planning more draconian legislation to clamp down on such activities!
Such actions can only but alienate (pun intended!) Labour from it’s core electorate!
Two dates are often mentioned by the Climate Change Brigade. These being 2030 and 2050. Given the level of political fallout that might take place by 2030 and the fact that by 2050 such fallout might have reached unsustainable levels it is my opinion that “First Contact” might take place on or around 2030.
In a way I hope so.
Why?
For the selfish reason that in 2030 I will be 75 whereas in 2050 I will be 95 and the chances of me “still breathing” will be much, much less!